Club Penguin Fanon Wiki talk:Final Solution/2013

When are we going ahead with this? -- Bro ^{Talk to me!} 02:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

I have set a date: June July 5th. This could be changed though. --User:Swiss Ninja (My Talk Page) 02:20, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

You mean June 25th? If so, I'm busy that day: Graduation. -- Bro ^{Talk to me!} 02:23, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

I think he means July 5th :3 Cp kid Wanna Talk? 03:24, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, i mean July 5th. Sorry. Curse Julius Caesar for naming his month after June. --User:Swiss Ninja (My Talk Page) 03:37, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

• Bill Gates and Macradonia are NOT LQA's. we grade them differently than how the CPW does it. We base our tagging on how much is on the article, not what is on the article.

--User:Swiss Ninja (My Talk Page) 14:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Most of these articles we're tagging are by IP's and users that have long gone. Most of them are utterly pointless on the wiki interface, and would be better in the CyberVoid than here. -- Bro ^{Talk to me!} 11:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Then again, there are hundreds of articles out there that have been abandoned and not edited in months. There are also a lot of articles that are tagged as being under construction, a large portion of them have also been abandoned. --Chub777 (Talk to your rollback!) 08:20, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

I agree with Snowstormer. Complete with it. Really. --Penstubal Chat! | Got Lemonade? 08:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Actually, Macradonia is a farewell high quality article. We cannot get rid of ultra, high or medium quality articles. Only low quality, stub and redlinked articles. --Penstubal Chat! | Got Lemonade? 08:55, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

This wiki is kind of supposed to be silly, wierd and odd... --Penstubal Chat! | Got Lemonade? 15:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Don't really see anything bad about Macradonia. And lets not start a flame war over an article. --Penstubal Chat! | Got Lemonade? 15:02, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

I feel like before we delete lots of things we should encourage people to go on LQA improving sprees and to adopt articles. It means more average and high quality articles I guess, and we won't be deleting good concepts that just need work. Just my opinion. --CreamLiberty, defender of the Peanut Butter. (talk) 16:23, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

^^^That's the point of the final solution. --User:Swiss Ninja (My Talk Page) 16:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Ah. Was mistaken on the intent of a Final Solution. --CreamLiberty

Im going to adopt some of old, LQA articles that haven't been edited for 2/3 years. And those who creators quit. --Penstubal Chat! | Got Lemonade? 11:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

We should delete some articles that need to be adopted but has not been adopted for a long time -- Alfredo! I'm borrowing money from you and you can't stop me! 3:08 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Why are we terminating the Final Solution? Nicktang10 13:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Gr... stupid memory block. Swiss told us on the IRC... something about TS's message about it. I think because it isn't supposed to be annual? That's all I remember. The rest is just mixed up with everything I'm trying to memorize for class.-- ARB (Your rollback to trust!) 13:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)