Help talk:An Independent Polaris
| Blast from the Past An Independent Polaris describes events that happened in the Past, as researched by the Time Agency. Be aware that these events are not in the Present or the Future, just the Past. They may be dead, torn down, or simply nonexistent in the present. |
Hello Wiki, it's Swiss.
Recently, i've seen that User:TurtleShroom and User:Aeronachos have been fighting constantly and for many months about the idea of completely seceding the Polaris SAD from the USA to become it's own independent nation.
According to TS, he argues that Polaris SAD should not secede because everything about the place is too Mary Suish.
Meanwhile, Aeronachos wants an independant country like some of us have, like Feey, Flywish, InsaneChibi, and myself.
Now Friends, it is up to you, the voters to find a solution to this conflict for good. Should Aero go ahead and make Polaris it's own independent republic, or shall TS win his case and Polaris stay as the SAD it already is? SAD...sad....heheheheheheheh.....funny....
Anyways, in my opinion, i'm for Aero, because we can always adjust the Polaris Republic so it doesn't have a Mary Suish appearance. For example...it could have a lack of military...or bankruptcy...or something like that, but i'm not making anything official.
Just don't take my words for it, but please vote for whatever you feel is right.
Let this conflict between TS and Aero end here. Please. Let's have a peaceful wiki without all this violent undo wars. BTW, there aren't any neutral boxes, so you're either for, against, or if you can't decide, please don't vote at all.
Thank you.
--
02:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Contents
Vote
For (4)
- Aero's aIrticle, Aero's choice! --Fly C. Wish Have a great school year my friends!
- I agree with Flywish on this. It IS HIS article, so he can do whatever he wants with it. Besides didn't it exist as a country in the 1500's?
- -- Sanchonachos Republicans:Stop Whining. 20:02, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Against (4)
- Mmm, Polaris is already nice enough. It could just be a client state, but there's no way it'll end up as a country. --Austin8310 King Radical. The most Radical Man in Radical Land.http://drmcninja.com/archives/comic/13p27/ 13:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- AAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGHHHHH RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE –† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) -BECAUSE I'M MINT, I'M MONEY!!! (-and an educated gentleman.) † † YES WE CAIN __[1]_ ―――――――</big> 13:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- --Agent Johnson | Proud to be English, not proud to support our football team :P 04:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Uuuupdate!
Thank you explorer for this one. From now on, all IRRELEVANT topics NOT pertaining to the establishment of the Polarian Republic WILL BE REMOVED. YES I'M TALKING TO YOU TS AND AERO; TS don't rant about Aero's "Inappropriate Term" because that's off topic and Aero, please do not rant on Christianity especially when only looking at TurtleShroom. Go make a different blog for that subject. After all, Explorer 767 is the voice of reason!
If you want, please debate ON TOPIC STUFF here.
- I shall cease all efforts to allow Polaris to be a independent nation should these demands be met by TurtleShroom:
1. The TOTAL repeal of Article Five of the Polarian SAD Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of Antarctica.
2. HOLINESS be renamed: The Federal Commission on Polarian Health and Long-Term Care, and BORNE to the The Federal Commission on Polarian Education.-- Sanchonachos Republicans:Stop Whining. 22:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- RE:
- 2. Why? Polaris is the most corrupt city in Antarctica. The BORNE and HOLINESS have punny meanings that keep the corrupt government from abusing its hospitals and turning its schools into liberal indoctrination centers, although the BORNE is totally a victim of regulatory capture. (The HOLINESS is not.)
- 3. See number two. The BORNE is totally a victim of regulatory capture.
- --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) -BECAUSE I'M MINT, I'M MONEY!!! (-and an educated gentleman.) † † YES WE CAIN __[1]_ ―――――――</big>{clear}} 22:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) -BECAUSE I'M MINT, I'M MONEY!!! (-and an educated gentleman.) † † YES WE CAIN __[1]_ ―――――――</big>{clear}} 22:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Dude. Polaris IS a Mary Sue. It's a perfect, shiny, pristine independant country that's perfectly good and happy.
NO PLACE IS EVER LIKE THAT.
EVER. Even with TS's added in balancing, it's still a mary sue. And to be quite frank, it being independent is silly and ridiculous. So let's NOT make it a country.
And Sancho is queer. Didn't you guys know that? That's why he wants to remove that article. --Austin8310 King Radical. The most Radical Man in Radical Land.http://drmcninja.com/archives/comic/13p27/ 02:17, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
I know Explorer will have a lot to say on this. ~~User:Icmer In Nyc
-Well, since Polaris is considered corrupt, it can always be Snoss! Or Castillan.....or something.... Besides, Snowzerland and Castilla or any AU Country has the power to invade and conquer the SAD since they act as the SAD's military. However, that can always be a plan B.... --
02:24, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
No Swiss, Polaris should be free and be its own nation. But they can be close allies with Snowzerland or Castilla, but Polaris could survive as a nation. Not ruled by ANYone. They're just have a little rocky start at the beginning, that' all.
- I just came back from a half-a-year long vacation with ponies. Now, what's this Polaris thing going on and about? Convince me and I'll see which side I take. Alex001 08:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Why do you guys not like Sancho? At one moment I didn't like him but I was just being stubborn. What's the problem now? :( If it's about homosexuality (which I believe it is considering how it was mentioned several times above), PLEASE stop arguing about that. What's wrong with being homosexual? Even though it is somewhat wrong, technically there really is nothing wrong with it. I'll call back XTUX (found him on deviantArt) to break the tie. Alex001 11:34, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
UPDATE
The voting is TIED! The voting is still going to continue until Friday, 9:00 PM PST if it's not tied then either!
--
01:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
It's not tied. There are 3 for, 4 against. Yours Truly, Explorer 767 (Let's say you come across an evil tree!) v • e 01:40, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thet's why I don't like people that use templates to sign their messages >_< --PenblooeR © 2011 01:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Actually, my dear Exxy, it's tied as Swiss states his support for "FOR" in the introduction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by some user (talk • contribs)
Touche. Sign your signature next time. Yours Truly, Explorer 767 (Let's say you come across an evil tree!) v • e 03:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
UPDATE OF AN UPDATE
The Voting is still tied! The Voting has been extended until someone breaks it! GOOD LUCK!
--
03:26, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Conclusion
The Voting is over with the "For" side winning! Polaris is now an independant country officially!
--
21:40, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
I CHANGE MY VOTE
There is now law stopping me from changing my mind after a vote. This vote has been restartrd.--Agent Johnson | Proud to be English, not proud to support our football team :P 04:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
This vote was closed a long time ago. Sancho decided not to do it anymore.
--
05:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
CASE CLOSED; SANCHO FORFITS