Club Penguin Fanon Wiki talk:Policy/Adoption

So, HQAs are adoptable now? --

Quackerpingu (talk). Who let the puffles out?

07:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)'

• This policy isn't finished yet, so I would say no. WannaTalk? 07:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

• “The quality of the article you are trying to adopt (LQA, AQA, HQA), should determine how much you have to improve the article before you can adopt it.”
  

~ You, on the policy page --

Quackerpingu (talk). Who let the puffles out?

08:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Like I said, it's not finished yet, which means that may be changed :) WannaTalk? 08:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

btw i didn't know that it didnt exist yet --

Quackerpingu (talk). Who let the puffles out?

08:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

We should really have "you're not allowed to adopt articles from active users", but I'm not sure how to write that in a way that doesn't sound awkward. ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • Chief of Forest Guarding Services 10:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

I think we should allow people to adopt articles even from active users, if the adopter hasn't edited in a long time and/or hasn't really improved it (still an LQA or something) WannaTalk? 13:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Personally, I think we should continue the policy of only allowing adoption of LQAs. Otherwise we would have people adopting more important articles, and not improving them as much, if at all. --User:EDFan12345 11:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

There is no policy, that's why I'm writing it </bants> But yeah I see you point, I was mainly thinking LQAs and AQAs, maybe HQAs you should get admin approval or something. WannaTalk? 13:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

I agree with CK. --

Quackerpingu (talk). Who let the puffles out?

15:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)