Talk:RDA Trooper

Swiss you do know that Snoss Shooting Star parodee the Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star was introduced at the end of World War 2 and has been retired. Why? Because it's outdated and they're much better fighters out there. Now, Aero just pointed out that the US Air Forces uses F/A-18 Hornets, which were introduced about 38 years later - meaning 38 years of better tech. Due to the fact that Boeing is constantly updating it (and also developed it into the Super Hornet), it means that the heavily outdated shooting star will stand no chance against modern jets. And don't say that the it is an updated version, because there is a limit to which how far a plane can be modified and updated. That's why new planes are made.

As for the Swisserschmidt (a parody of the Bf 109), which has no basic guided missiles, is sluggish and is powered by a propeller, will pretty much be target practice for any opposition air force. In conclusion, Snowzerland will have to modernise to have a chance of survival against the US Air Force.--Agent Johnson |  I'm Brit-ish and cause of that, I'm Liberal. 18:10, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Propellers? Seriously? Man, that's awful. The RDA is supposed to be high technology. Really high technology. I was thinking of making a helicopter based off the Comanche warhelicopter. That's a plane that would suit the RDA. WWII planes...will stand no chance. I mean, the Swissersmitts or whatever are okay for the Snoss Army (they have strength in numbers) but not the RDA. Swissersmitts? Jet fighters would be more fitting. While you're at it, give the Snoss biplanes. --Austin8310 ^{Bow ties are COOL.} 19:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

NO NO NO! WHAT THE ____ is the matter with you people?????!!!!!!! You're criticzing me like crazy! and you stupid fools haven't even realized yet taht the SHOOTING STAR WAS AN ORIGINAL NAME FROM AN ORIGINAL DESIGN I MADE MYSELF. IT IS NOT A PARODY. It's actually the closest to the Hornet than the WW2 airplane.

-- 00:47, 11 April 2011 (UTC)