User:DZGuymed/That's Death Reform

From Club Penguin Fanon Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
We now have 10 members for the the That's Death Reform. Please can nobody else add their name, as the project has already started here. Skip to the Verdict section below, or go to the forum and read EVERYTHING there, then vote.


This is the official page for the That's Death! Reform group.

Members[edit]

Sign your name below to become a member.

Goals[edit]

List your goals below.

  • TurtleShroom: To monitor the entire project and to override radical reforms. To enforce all things good and decent. To prevent this from going overboard. To maintain our reputation. To balence the lax with what we have and to prevent any allowing of Un-CP. I agree, though, we can lessen the restrictions death without being unholy, but still no stabbing or hanging, etc. . All death must be instanteneous to even get a chance. I will also to the actual writing onto the code, and will have the final say in the matter, along with Explorer. I vow to not make this go overboard! --† This is Serious Business! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †  :)  :) TurtleShroom Productions: Patent Pending. † 22:51, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

I think we should remove some laws on death religious. As for the censorship I'm going to post a age forum on the main page. It'll be temporary. -- Firmato per Il Dirigente Conversazione verso Il Dirigente 16:17, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

  • DZGuymed: To reduce restrictions on death, as well as some censorship. Mods abuse their powers on chat a lot too... I'd like to change that as well.
  • Ninjinian: To make more fair rules and make sure that there are not too much. Ditto'ed with DZ.
  • Look4Sonic: To monitor this COC Reform until TurtleShroom gets word. Ditto'ed with DZ and Ninjinian.
  • Mectrixctic: same with DZ, and possibly reducing restrictions on other things.
  • Zapwire: More reasonable bans and policies.
  • Sanchonachos: Would like to reduce restrictions on some things, and maybe do a review of the COC, and possibly remove or introduce new laws., Ditto with Mec, and DZ.
  • E-114: More dramatic story endings.
  • The Leader: Less religion laws. Censorship should be decided based on age poll.
  • Idoreconise: Legalizing some kinds of death, reducing restrictions, correcting the laws, so they don't have legal loopholes.
  • Sheepman Mainly the sane as DZ. Also, to loosen the Deletion Laws as TS says below.

Ideas[edit]

  • Like Explorer said, lets not go overboard. Just a reasonable amount of change. |||~~DZGuymed~~||| 22:38, January 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Stabbing, no. I personally don't condemn explosions (often causes instantaneous death), but others here do. Out of respect, we can't do it. Or, at least we can't use traditional explosions. Have you considered allowing Ditto explosions to completely paralyze characters, who then require months of rehabilitation to move again? Or, how about laxing the restrictions on Deletion? That's legal. Also, we DO allow injuries, which can be severe as desired, so long as they do not get descriptivew. They must, emphasis on must, survive to have a disastrous injury. --† This is Serious Business! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †  :)  :) TurtleShroom Productions: Patent Pending. † 01:06, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

So then I guess Ditto is more lethal than thought. As for injuries, how's being put into a permanent coma? Citcxirtcem BAAAAAWW to me! see my 5,676 edits! 02:02, January 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Can we have people be shot? I wanted E-114 to get shot at black shot range by X-114 wearing special armor, except E doesn't die, he faints and goes to the hospital. --E-114 I am not the robot you are looking for 01:25, January 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • I hate the thought of being stabbed, so I'm with TS on that. Explosions are usually instant death causers so I wouldn't worry about that. I'm especially not against getting shot. |||~~DZGuymed~~||| 17:00, January 17, 2010 (UTC)


  • Being stabbed is a dreadful thought. Penguins aren't that maniac - they don't use knifes to actually kill, do they Explosions would be fine. I don't see how drowning is possible as long as the penguin can swim... choking is convenient. I believe dying from illnesses i.e. Fat is possible. Those can all become common ways of Death. Severe bone-breaking can lead to Death aswell. And E-114 - isn't that a bit too much drama? A penguin getting shot, sent to hospital, then lives? Getting shot is the same as getting stabbed - penguins wouldn't shoot somebody. I hope that's clear now. Not that tragic deaths. I'll make a list. -- N-Sig.PNG ¤ (User page!) (The Cookie Master, bow!) 20:31, January 18, 2010 (UTC)


  • Well I need someone to get snowball shot for my character to actually participate in a story. Could I make a special kind of snowball that paralyses for hours rather then seconds? --Sheepman (Talk page OF DOOM) 21:33, January 22, 2010 (UTC)


Being shot is not a horrible way to die. It's just one shot, and then the victim usually dies without feeling much pain. Plus, it's been used in a lot of G and PG rated movies. And if there are humans that are maniacs, penguins can become one too seeing that they're antrhomorphicized. Anyways, I've heard stories of penguins pecking each other to death with their beaks. That shouldn't be legal, but you catch my drift. Citcxirtcem BAAAAAWW to me! see my 5,676 edits! 21:48, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
Haven't you played Call of Duty? One shot does not kill them, only if it hits their heart or certain arterites. It take about three bullets to kill on person, and its pretty hard to get a headshot...--☺Happyface☺ Iron Walrus is Watching You. Always. 23:24, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
I don't think you don't know how shooting works. My uncle is a hunter; he hunts wild deer. My cousin-in-law also does it. When shooting at deer, the goal is to kill them as quickly and humanely as possible. Though guns are definately NOT humane, a skilled hunter can fell one with a few shots, so the deer will not suffer more than a split second. If the hunter happens to miss-aim, they may hit the deer in a part that, though painful, can't knock it out. This would require a second or third bullet to kill it. Now, that first bullet is going to be felt. The second and third as well, but the deer dies immediantly after that. One-hit-kills are the goal when hunting deer. Contrary to what PETA tells you, hunters actually respect the animals they're firing at and try to kill them as fast and painless as possible. In the case of my uncle and cousin-in-law, they also use as much of the deer as possible, mainly by eating it (they love deer meat; I've never tried it).
I've said all of that to say this. Like HF said, only some parts of a target can kill them painlessly. The rest will hurt severely. HF seems to think he has human anatomy down, while I'm discussing deer. Either way, our points are that it's very difficult to kill someone or something immediantly with a gun. It will be felt, and that violates the Code. It must be instanteneous.
--† This is Serious Business! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †  :)  :) TurtleShroom Productions: Patent Pending. † 21:29, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

  • I love COD.. anyhoo is it ok if I make those extra long stun snowballs then? --Sheepman (Talk page OF DOOM) 08:18, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
    • Stun snowballs? You mean, like tasers? Oh yes, go ahead. We already have that in the Snow Ball Gun. Make something like a Snowball Gun Deluxe, or something. OR, you could even edit the Snow Ball Gun article to extend its stun time.
    • Here's another idea: Instead of using caliber measurements (e.g. 25mm caliber rifle), why not use the diameter of the snowball? For example, a snowball shooter four inches wide would be a 4-cm2 rifle. 4, meaning the snowball is four inches across, cm2, the metric measurement for spheres. Explorer will have-- dare I say it --a ball withthat! Get it? BALL? --† This is Serious Business! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †  :)  :) TurtleShroom Productions: Patent Pending. † 21:29, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

  • You should also list the concentration of the Ditto A in the snowball. Try dividing the number of moles of Ditto A by the total number of moles in the snowball. And TS, cm^2 is a measurement for area. Yours Truly, Explorer 767 (The Internet is Tubes!) View this template 03:04, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Tasers: All the Pain, No Death[edit]

Here's an alternative to getting shot.

Tasers are REALLY, REALLY painful. Have you ever seen someone get nailed with a taser?



^ That will suit our database nicely.


You can fire a taser at an opponent, knock them to the floor, and drag them off. It's an excellent weapon.

Or, you could fire a taser, knock out the victim then exploit the Code in various ways, as this.


--† This is Serious Business! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †  :)  :) TurtleShroom Productions: Patent Pending. † 21:29, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

These could surely be used by police legally in Owcatraz & The Facility. Is this a way to die, or a way of torture? -- N-Sig.PNG ¤ (User page!) (The Cookie Master, bow!) 21:52, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Verdict[edit]

We need to start to reform the That's Death code now. First, I'll make an official forum to vote & submit ways of Death, then we can vote which ones to remove or modify. Then we'll edit That's Death! and it will all be reformed. What do you think? I'll make the forum, and at the same time keep deciding on everything. -- N-Sig.PNG ¤ (User page!) (The Cookie Master, bow!) 11:28, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://fanon.clubpenguinwiki.info/w/index.php?title=User:DZGuymed/That%27s_Death_Reform&oldid=227835"