User blog talk:Agent Johnson/Important/Commentary
- Here's another way to say it:
- I've done so much for this site, and I constantly get thanked with coups d'etats instead of pats on the back.
- --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) They're after my money! STOP THEM! † † UNDER REPRESENTATION, PRESIDENTE! YOU ARE NOT IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF YOUR PEOPLE EVERY WAKING MOMENT! __[1]_[2] ―――――――</big> 21:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Because you think you're superior to everyone in this wiki just because you've been here for ages. This is not right, every user can contribute to the wiki and share their opinions and points of view. TurtleShroom, you're not a webmaster anymore. "I've done more for this site than anything you have ever done.". So what? Do your edits mean that your opinions weight more than mine?Just because you edit since the start of the wiki it doesn't mean that you're always right. Seahorse's form of government works pretty well for CPW, while the CPFW is always a chaos. --PenBlooeR 21:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to ask, why are we even bothering with this? To actually have a set of rules, we need people to follow them, and we need people. We're focusing on the wrong things here, people. We should be focusing on ways to welcome new users, find new users, and article quality. ----Happyface414 (talk|blog|contribs) 22:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
The rules are confusing, someone who comes from another CPWN project may be confused because the ruleset is completely different, and the same happens when someone edits the CPFW and wants do edit another wiki in the CPWN. Making a global policy with just a few differences between wikis would solve this problem. And the current form of governance is not effective, there are flaws and there's always some kind of drama going on. --PenBlooeR 22:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
