User blog talk:Cp kid/USIP

Apply to help

Please state what section(s) you'd like to help with, and why you should be allowed to help there.

• I'd like to help write the military section because I know a lot about war, vehicles, weapons, etc. I also wrote a story, called the Frosian War. ~Example
• for some reason when I saw a title i thought this was gonna be a pro-Donald Trump post, turns out it's about fanon USA. anyway uh I wanna participate in the project and help write the geography stuff things :3 --Penstubal ^{(Talk) (Edits)} 13:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Anthem

Also to note, we need to pick a new anthem for the USA. It's gone four years without one. -- Bro ^{Talk to me!} 00:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

If we eventually get an anthem, I kinda want it to still be called "CURRENTLY BEING RE-SELECTED; PENDING APPROVAL FROM THE GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC". ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • Chief of Forest Guarding Services 12:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

It is such a classy anthem! --Penstubal ^{(Talk) (Edits)} 16:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

New Goal, new Article Quality

I personally think for this new goal, we should create a new category of article called "Omnipotent Article" or "Magnificent Article," which basically means that it has been cut, polished, and made to be the standard of articles on the wiki. With what you are planning, I personally think that the USA can serve as the first and prime example of such articles, where we, as a community, sculpted and rewrote the article to said category of greatness. It's a fitting title for what will be a fitting article on this wiki.

And, I personally think that this should be applied only toward articles of such nature, where we as a community took the time to finally polish and set on display a magnificent example of literacy and lore. -Wonderweez ^{(Talk · Contribs)} 05:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

In a way I believe the Ultra Quality Article certification serves that purpose, which are the best of the best articles. A certification exclusive to the USA (and possibly one or two other articles) would practically be an award instead. -- ¤ (User page!) (Talk page.) 18:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

I agree that is the reason why UQA exists. I think we're just doing the UQA title justice by keeping it as our modern definition of a UQA, because like with any article, it can drop in quality over the years if article standards rise. WannaTalk? 22:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

I can apply

I can apply to help with geography stuff and making a detailed city map of the USA. Besides, most maps we ALREADY have of the USA are quite messy. I still think I should add cities and define the state borders in the process. --Penstubal ^{(Talk) (Edits)} 13:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Ummm

As much as I like helping the wiki, I don't think I should take part in this. I'm an awful country writer and I'd be a liability... --Mr Cow2 (talk) 15:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for being honest :) You can always still comment on things with your opinion (on the project talk pag), or even bring up new topics, and maybe you could help out by editing and improving other USA-related articles, there are probably a thousand of them. WannaTalk? 18:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome, but if there's any immediate way I can help, please let me know. --Mr Cow2 (talk) 22:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)