User talk:CK/IP Draft

For whom this affects.. I'd like to say any admin that hasn't edited in five months should be demoted. If there is anyone left after that who hasn't edited in like... two months, they should have until the end of January to become active again, to give them time to see the new policy. I wasn't quite sure if 20 was a good number of minimum edits per month or not, so tell me what you think about that. I also tried to include the meaning of "inactivity" and IRC presence. WannaTalk? 09:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

For the rollbacks, "not using your rights" isn't necessarily fair as there may not be a reason to use the tool for a while, such as no vandalism or no OOC violations. ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • Youtube Pointlessness is pointless. 09:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Er, right below that I included the original exception- "If there is little to no vandalism on the site, a user can not be demoted for lack of using their rights, as it is not their fault."

Seems alright. I agree with the fact that admins/bcrats have to earn back their rights. Usually, we get a person coming through, editing twice and the leaving again. I also like how the community can have a say in these promotion/demotions, -- Chub777(Talk Page) 11:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Administrator greenlight

This section is for administration only, don't edit it.

I highly recommend discussion about the draft prior to signing, but this section is for administrators to sign, showing their approval of the current draft to be indoctrinated as wiki law. So, don't sign unless you agree with everything! If you don't agree with something, say so up above! All active admin signatures would be ideal for this to pass, but only four are required if no consensus can be met pertaining to a specific issue with the draft. It will not be put into effect until it pleases and is green-lit by as many administrators as possible. However, if an issue arises and no consensus can be met after a certain amount of time (maybe a week), only four signatures will be required, as previously mentioned. Sorry for the crappy wording, it's 4 AM so I'm kinda just babbling at this point but I had to get this done, I've been putting it off for like two weeks.

1. WannaTalk? 09:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
2. Seems legit ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • Youtube EVERYBODY WALK THE DINOSAUR 10:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
3. not amigopen 10:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
4. -Wonderweez ^{(Talk · Contribs)} 00:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
5. --User:Swiss Ninja (My Talk Page) 04:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
6. -- Bro ^{Talk to me!} 05:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)